Trump's 'confederate' insurrection
How scared is polite white society? We’re about to find out.
| Jan 7 | 7 | 7 |
At the end of yesterday’s edition of the Editorial Board, I said you should not expect the Republicans to change. They lost the White House. They have now lost the US Senate. But they won’t do any soul-searching. They won’t pull back from the brink. They will do what they were elected to do. They will represent a wholly imagined nation-within-a-nation, a confederacy of the mind and spirit where “real Americans” live and where anyone who is not a Republican is, no proof required, the “enemy of the people.”
As I pressed the publish button, an enraged mob broke off from a massive rally in Washington in support of Donald Trump on the day the US Congress was set to tally electoral votes showing Joe Biden to be the next president. Under Trump’s explicit direction, the mob lay siege to the Capitol. They broke windows, smashed doors, ransacked offices, and generally overran security. Guns were drawn. Police fired teargas. A woman was shot and killed. Lawmakers were rushed away, provided with gas masks. The most striking images from ground zero were those of rioters waving flags honoring the old Confederacy. Cory Booker, a Senate Democrat, later connected those dots. That flag represents old political forces that nearly brought down the republic. That flag represents new political forces that are trying to do it again.
Political violence on the outside of “democracy’s temple” was paired with political violence on the inside.
Legislators reconvened in the evening. They finished the job about 3 this morning. But as I watched the Post’s coverage, I sensed from reporters speaking that the tone in Washington had changed. I was told the Republicans were chastened by displays of real violence, real blood, and real tragedy. But even as reporters spoke, even as some Republican senators pulled back, the rest of their party put the lie to such happy talk.
Representative Andy Harris nearly started a fistfight after Conor Lamb, a Democrat, said the attack “didn’t materialize out of nowhere. It was inspired by lies—the same lies you’re hearing in this room tonight.” “He called me a liar,” Harris was heard saying. He’d have come to blows had aides not stepped in. Political violence on the outside of “democracy’s temple” was paired with political violence on the inside.
Here’s the tip jar!
Pre-putsch, it was possible to see attempts by the Republicans to overthrow the election as familiar Washington theater. The Democrats control the House. Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, is in no more mood for Trump. All of this is sturm und drang. Nothing to be worried about. If something serious happened, they’d surely check themselves. Politics is one thing, after all. Real life is something else.
Post-putsch, it’s impossible. This isn’t theater. They mean it. Their intentions are clear. Josh Hawley and six other Republican senators really did vote to deny the legitimacy of Pennsylvania’s lawful election. Nearly 140 House Republicans really did the same. Ted Cruz and five other Republican senators really did vote to deny the legitimacy of Arizona’s lawful election. More than 120 House Republicans really did the same.
They declared where they stand—against the Union and for a confederacy of the mind and spirit. Through it all, they repeated the same lies, the same propaganda and the same venom that fueled insurgents storming the Capitol, leading to a woman’s death. The Republicans were not chastened. They were not humbled. They were inspired.
The only way for the Republicans to change is to break them. We have the first steps. Take the presidency. Take the Senate. But the Democrats can’t, and apparently won’t, stop there. Biden called the putsch an “insurrection.” In short order, respectable white people were following suit, even McConnell. The Post used the word without quotes. (So did public radio’s “Marketplace,” of all things.) Chuck Schumer, the next Senate majority leader, stepped past “insurrection” to call Trump’s mob “domestic terrorists.” All of this pushed Twitter to lock Trump’s account temporarily. Facebook banned him indefinitely. White House attorneys reportedly warned aides they could be tried for treason if they go along with Trump. His Cabinet is reportedly discussing invoking the 25th Amendment. Polite white society seems to be universally appalled, and scared.
It should be. But is it scared enough? Trump really is the leader of an insurgency whose participants are armed, paranoid, dangerous and deadly. Some on the inside of the GOP—Hawley, Cruz, Republicans in the House, et al.—really are working in tandem, or in coordination, with an illegitimate movement seeking to replace our nation with a wholly imagined confederate nation within our nation, one where “real Americans” live and anyone who opposes Donald Trump is “the enemy of the people.”
He’s going to be president for the next two weeks. A long two weeks. “What happened at the US Capitol yesterday was an insurrection against the United States, incited by the president,” Schumer said today. “This president should not hold office one day longer. If the Vice President and the Cabinet refuse to stand up, Congress should reconvene to impeach the president.” How scared is polite white society?
We’re about to find out.
—John Stoehr
| 7 | 7 |
Check out Andy Harris's Wikipedia page. He's the worst of the worst.
The worst possible response is a "this too shall pass." Biden's old instincts would be to compromise, find common ground, and all that other nonsense. He would do far better to have far larger sticks than carrots. Indeed, the only legitimate carrot is a simple "you're either for the rule of democratic law or not." Where you are not--and where you have not been so in the last four years--there is only the stick. That's the minimum requirement, obligation or expectation. It also makes for good politics. If Trump supporters are so desirous of a strong man, I can't imagine Biden having an easier time making use of the fullest extent of the law in its execution. It's what's due to the "law and order" party anyway. In terms of politics, I see no blowback and little viable martyrdom. ("How dare you give me jail time for trashing the Capitol?" Really? I ain't seeing it.)
In short, Biden has lots of room to drop hammers. He easily has the high moral ground; it's good politics to both the progressive base (who want to see these idiots and fanatics punished soundly) and the moderates (who are usually so "all in" for law and order in their own typically mealy mouthed way); it's good management (removing the cancer of Trumpism from within the federal government should be a priority, and politically easy) and its good policy when it comes to ensuring stable government. The one very real trouble point his administration will have is in the one arena that has sorely exacerbated the entire matter: social media. Here he runs headlong into free speech protections, and I think with the right tone in terms of legal argument (penalization for fraud, slander/libel, endangering the public) and political positioning (in short, making social media companies feel the heat and potential regulatory consequences of their amoral profiteering), he has a chance of reigning in the misinformation machinery that social media companies treat so lightly and that endanger us so greatly.