Quick Take: M4A's unseen flaw?
I don't think anyone's talked about this. Thoughts?
|John Stoehr||Oct 22, 2019|| 3||13|
Writing can feel like a solitary exercise but it isn’t really. Not in our connected age. For that, I’m grateful. After I wrote today about why Elizabeth Warren should never ever say that she’s going to raise taxes to pay for universal health care, I read this:
"If the Democrats run on Medicare for All, we will lose in a landslide. You cannot plan to rob every full-time worker in American of a significant part of their total compensation (the health insurance employers subsidize) and get elected."
That comment came from Burgs. I don’t know his, her or their real name. But I do know that’s a great point I haven’t heard much about. Warren and others supporting universal health care are right to talk about costs more than taxes. I don’t think anyone, however, has addressed this problem: the appearance of a pay cut.
Like or not, our economic system care has priced-in the cost of health insurance into the price of labor. If I’m right, and I’m open to correction, the program of universal health care that the Democrats are talking about might eliminate that cost, and in doing so give the appearance of a pay cut, even though there would be no such cut. You would still be taking home the same wages. Your gross pay would just be smaller.
As I said, open to correction. Maybe I’m overthinking this. What I do know is that I haven’t seen anyone debate this even on the level of political optics. Thoughts?
A new CNN poll has a majority of Americans favoring not only Trump’s impeachment but his removal too. He proves the claims against him every day.
Last week, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell again said he’d have no choice but to hold a trial if the House decides to indict the president.
Climate change will make creeping fascism pick up pace, says Nils Gilman.
Trump moved from calling impeachment a coup to a lynching. Fun times.
Nicholas Grossman says Warren’s honesty is more important than taxes.