Discussion about this post

User's avatar
I-Can't-Even's avatar

I get what you're saying, and, as the media has repeatedly pointed out, it only takes one juror for a mistrial. I think most of us are hoping that's the worst possible outcome. An acquittal on all counts would cause "unrest" of a magnitude I don't want to guess at. The fact that the blue line broke down with police witnesses testifying against Chauvin gives me hope that this case will be different from all the compelling data you've laid out--but it's also a way of saying that Chauvin doesn't represent the systemic problems of policing. The prosecution already built that argument into their closing words. It's just painful.

Expand full comment
jibal jibal's avatar

I think the odds were against Chauvin (and I thought so before the verdict came in) *in this specific case* because the pressure from we the people was so great that the state actually charged him and put on a competent prosecution ... that's extremely rare.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts